9:15 PM (d) on April 16

I guess, umm, we will chat with ChatGPT, and use Postgresql, because we know how to use it easily

But I might switch to Mongo

It sounds a tad bit cooler

And it's faster

Data and stats can be used to show or say anything

What matters is whether it is EASY, and whether it WORKS or not

# 1
The image displays a screenshot of a web browser with a focus on a search for images related to "MongoDB vs. PostgreSQL." The browser interface is dark-themed, indicating it may be in a night mode setting. In the center of the image, there is a prominent chart titled "MongoDB vs PostgreSQL - Transaction Performance." The chart features two sets of vertical bars representing performance metrics for both databases. The y-axis is labeled with "Transactions / second," while the x-axis is labeled with "Concurrent threads," showing values ranging from 1 to 256. The bars for PostgreSQL are depicted in blue, while those for MongoDB are shown in red. The chart indicates that PostgreSQL outperforms MongoDB as the number of concurrent threads increases, with PostgreSQL reaching peak values around 30,000 transactions per second. Surrounding the main chart are several other thumbnails of images related to database comparisons. These include graphs, infographics, and presentations, with various logos and branding visible. One thumbnail features the logo of EDB, which is associated with PostgreSQL. Another thumbnail shows a comparison chart with the logos of MongoDB and PostgreSQL side by side. The browser tabs at the top indicate that the user has multiple pages open, including YouTube and Facebook, suggesting a casual browsing context. The visible time on the browser indicates it is 3:36 AM, and the date is noted as Wednesday, April 16. Overall, the image captures a moment of research or comparison regarding database performance, specifically between MongoDB and PostgreSQL, with a focus on transaction performance metrics.
California, USA Written, published, and designed in California, USA