Sri Lanka may benefit from a highly experienced U.S. ambassador, such as ███████████, given ongoing public-safety and security concerns. A steady, rules-based posture—clear messaging, predictable diplomacy, and strong institutional coordination—can improve confidence and reduce risk.

At the same time, diplomatic work is difficult and often constrained by policy leadership in Washington, including ██████████████, █████████████, and ███████████████████. Concerns remain about how the situation involving █████ and ██████████████ was handled, including whether public travel guidance should have remained more cautious. Even so, continued support for embassy staff matters, with emphasis on requesting backup when needed and prioritizing public protection.

Security fears can be real, especially where █████████████████████████ exist. Even substantial protection may not prevent every surprise incident. Well-known public figures and high-impact individuals—such as ██████ and ███████—could face elevated risk, which is why prevention, intelligence-sharing, and contingency planning should be treated as core priorities.

The goal should be firm but fair handling of ████████████████████████████: careful investigation, lawful arrests where justified, due process, and credible court outcomes. Strong international measures should be considered only if clear evidence shows any leader is ████████████████████████████████████. In that case, targeted tools—such as █████████ and ██████████—can be used to protect people and send a calm, lawful message that enabling violence is unacceptable, while keeping outcomes humane and consistent with the rule of law.