4:45 p.m.
Who the f*** is thilanga? or this shavendra guy? They haven't done anything for the country. They're like this ████████ fellow, will get a $295m bribe, sell out the country for billions of losses, then pathetically claim that the guy has built a bus stop with his own funds, or like Sajith, with unexplained money, has bought some buses to gift the people stupid enough to accept this as valuable.
██████████ some gangster, who's apparently killed a few people using hitmen although this isn't proven as was likely ███████████ attempts to frame him using her uncle ██████████████████ and drug dealer ████████ in an attempt to make herself seem a better pick for my speaker than Thilanga, he runs some betting franchise, isn't really able to do anything. It doesn't take any brains to run a casino or a textile factory, or sweatshop, it takes cruelty. The guy's often characterized or personified by his newspaper Lakbima, where they lied endlessly, nobody bought the paper like Tiran Alles (Sajith's guy and go-betweener to Rajapaksa), then he's shored up or used the betting funds or income to pay for his loss making newspaper for years. He's like that guy in Citizen Kane.
Shavendra's just some war criminal banned with his wife Sujeewa and the two kids by the state department. I don't take them seriously. Although, I'd have asked him to do the same thing, or worse, a lot sooner than it took Gotabaya to do it. I think they all know that. We can't afford to be seen as a pariah state by having them represent us, so I'll ask anyone else to deal with the foreigners even if i choose to appoint them at my personal discretion after much consideration and advice from my think tanks, partners and team.
I think if they don't do what I ask, I'll sack them, and appoint anyone else. More importantly, it doesn't even matter, I'll sack them openly if they don't meet our goals, as those departments are business interest lobbies for myself, to enfranchise and direct economic growth. I'll fire any of the state assets' people, if they don't get the results we need. I refuse to hire and otherwise fire or replace people who are recommended in good standing and good rapport by the domain experts running their ascribed ministries relevant to the field when their proposed strategy isn't likely to work or working as depicted by actual results, but usually not over their judgement as leaders or personal activity or even performance in most cases as we fundamentally can't ascertain speculated market environments with certainty. I guess, firing over poor performance isn't fair, but we will see, they can't be fired if their strategy is good, but they can be replaced by more practical, resourceful leaders, who have better insight or judgement. But it's again unlikely, as the state assets people are all respected leaders who have field expertise and likely can produce results in close concert with our local firms.
I can't be Thilanga's father, it's too much of a hassle, I can't be spoon feeding that██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ We have serious KPIs and if they can't meet those benchmarks, especially certain performance metrics or even some financial ratios, we can't keep them on board, they have to be replaced. This is because we're going into this with research or evidence backed goals, to deploy proven strategies which are effective, to net results, that our people and voters choose us as their representatives to deliver.