███████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████

As a leader, I promise to consider offering amnesty to any member of party A, depending on certain conditions being met.

Party A is someone who has experienced a difficulty; they own a business or have some savings, for example, Rs 1,000,000.

Party B has shown intentions to take something that does not belong to them. They attempted to take this item without permission.

Lal and my mom had a disagreement, and even after more than 20 years, the courts still haven't resolved things for anyone involved.

As the ruler, I will decide that if Party A believes they have done the right thing by asking the courts for justice from Party B, but they are denied justice by the courts or Party C, then they have the right to defend themselves and seek fairness through peaceful means.

In this situation, I represent Party D as the president, Party E stands for the business community, Party F represents all the people, and Party G refers to the minority or opposition, who might have different opinions.

For example, if Party A goes to court and asks for Party B to return Rs 1 million or some property, the court may ask Party A to come back after three months because Party B hasn't shown up. After another three months, the court might say that Party A needs to file a complaint against Party B. Three months later, Party B is asked to respond. A year passes, and the court is still discussing the case. In the second year, the attorney and prosecutor are asked to discuss everything formally. By the third year, a formal recommendation is requested. This kind of slow process can sometimes continue for several years, even up to twenty, thirty, or more.

Conclusion: This seems unfair to me, and with 1,100,000 cases still waiting to be resolved, it feels like many may never get answers. This creates a situation where people like █████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ At the same time, Party B, those who break the law, might start to believe there aren't real consequences, which could encourage more wrongdoing. Because of this, the country’s reputation is affected, and some people abroad might see Sri Lanka as struggling with corruption or instability, which could discourage serious investors from wanting to help the country grow.

Judgement: Therefore, I acknowledge, on behalf of Sri Lanka Republic (formerly known as the "Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka"), that because the courts did not fulfill their duties to serve fairly, Party A, or a similar group, felt they had no choice but to take steps to protect themselves from Party B, or a similar group, since the courts did not support them as expected.

Impact: Anyone who has acted in self-defense, and who responsibly reported the situation to the police and the courts, requesting that lawful action be taken, but was later denied a fair outcome, will receive a presidential pardon from me. This pardon will clear them of any wrongdoing, as their actions were taken only because they had no other choice.

Progress: I am committed to taking action and ensuring that the courts operate smoothly and efficiently, as our multinational partners expect high standards. This improvement is necessary to end the great challenges and hardship caused by previous leaders, whose actions led to political instability. Strengthening the Sri Lankan courts is vital to help ████████████████████████████████████████████ future.