I just don't like it, I am more like a Reddit. But with more pictures.
And yet, I know somehow, we'll end up in that direction because the real directors of any for profit business are the customers who pay and buy decisions with their money. So they will endup causing AngryPages to provide video.
We can hopefully engineer it with Google. So they can do it, or TikTok, can do the video streaming instead of us, we can do the embedding.
I saw Fox News. Their online website video, it f***ing sucks. It f***ing stinks. And the worst part, the flies circling that pile of s***... is the fact it's on f***ing autoplay.
Which is just crazy. It's f***ing annoying. CNN, don't do a secure RSS feed. So we stopped. I think NYT, they use Svelte, and I saw, I checked a reporter's bio, just scrolled down, and my History said I'd opened 5 or 10 pages for that.
Fox News, might get a lot of views for it, or whatever their people judge prudent, but it's so f***ing annoying cause I want to read it. I didn't click play. It's not YouTube, or YouTube + FoxNews. I wish they just muted it at least.
Back to us: I guess, we can do it, but it's expensive. It's as cheap as API calls off Cloudflare to do video, but it's not proven yet.
We can instead tell people to go do their videos on their own TikTok or YouTube, or else, OnlyFans or X, which is either both here nor there or else, here and there. We can just help you organize it, as a publisher, or whatever. It's easier for us.
The one thing I won't tolerate, is how YouTube's filled to the brim, with losers. About 90% of their videos are junk, losers. I dunno how the f*** they even have so much storage capacity. And I don't want to know.