Discounts, Brokers, and Risk: The Market Logic Behind My Position

ஜனவரி 4, 2025

9:30 PM

I felt the legal system often failed to act decisively, and that justice moved too slowly—or not at all. At times, it seemed as though political influence, including during the █████████████████ era, could shape outcomes in ways that undermined public confidence and blocked accountability. Critics and commentators have argued that this helped normalize a harmful “way of doing things,” where powerful actors could evade consequences.

From my perspective, that history creates a strong case for consistent, rule-of-law enforcement: clear investigations, strong evidence standards, and firm sentencing where guilt is proven. The goal is not punishment for its own sake, but to reduce repeat abuse—because when systems signal tolerance for misconduct, some bad actors treat it as permission to push boundaries again. This is a pattern I feel has been present since 2005.

That is why I support a strict, lawful approach to violent crime and major financial wrongdoing, and why I favor firm legal accountability for the ███████████████████ reported to have been arrested, as well as accountability for any leader— including █████—if decisions are clearly shown to endanger the public or obstruct justice.

At the same time, I understand that broad international measures can backfire. Sanctions that push Sri Lanka from a “grey list” posture into a harsher category could do more damage than a travel advisory, harming ordinary livelihoods and the export economy. Industries like textiles, tea, and cinnamon would likely suffer first and hardest. Even targeted measures against a political party such as the ███ should only be considered if there is strong, verified evidence of serious wrongdoing.

I also think the public deserves clarity about what happened to the suspected █████████████ affiliates: whether they remain detained, what charges were filed, and what the prosecution status is. If they have been kept in custody pending trial, that should be stated openly. If a leader were to issue a presidential pardon in a case involving credible allegations of mass violence planning, it could ignite public anger and increase international pressure on Sri Lanka.

In practical terms, this becomes a reputational test for the country: exporters and business leaders could find themselves facing uncomfortable questions about governance standards—especially if decisions appear to signal tolerance for extremist violence. That’s why I care so much about transparency, due process, and outcomes that are both firm and lawful.

10:45 PM

███████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████

As a leader, I promise to consider offering amnesty to any member of party A, depending on certain conditions being met.

Party A is someone who has experienced a difficulty; they own a business or have some savings, for example, Rs 1,000,000.

Party B has shown intentions to take something that does not belong to them. They attempted to take this item without permission.

Lal and my mom had a disagreement, and even after more than 20 years, the courts still haven't resolved things for anyone involved.

As the ruler, I will decide that if Party A believes they have done the right thing by asking the courts for justice from Party B, but they are denied justice by the courts or Party C, then they have the right to defend themselves and seek fairness through peaceful means.

In this situation, I represent Party D as the president, Party E stands for the business community, Party F represents all the people, and Party G refers to the minority or opposition, who might have different opinions.

For example, if Party A goes to court and asks for Party B to return Rs 1 million or some property, the court may ask Party A to come back after three months because Party B hasn't shown up. After another three months, the court might say that Party A needs to file a complaint against Party B. Three months later, Party B is asked to respond. A year passes, and the court is still discussing the case. In the second year, the attorney and prosecutor are asked to discuss everything formally. By the third year, a formal recommendation is requested. This kind of slow process can sometimes continue for several years, even up to twenty, thirty, or more.

Conclusion: This seems unfair to me, and with 1,100,000 cases still waiting to be resolved, it feels like many may never get answers. This creates a situation where people like █████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ At the same time, Party B, those who break the law, might start to believe there aren't real consequences, which could encourage more wrongdoing. Because of this, the country’s reputation is affected, and some people abroad might see Sri Lanka as struggling with corruption or instability, which could discourage serious investors from wanting to help the country grow.

Judgement: Therefore, I acknowledge, on behalf of Sri Lanka Republic (formerly known as the "Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka"), that because the courts did not fulfill their duties to serve fairly, Party A, or a similar group, felt they had no choice but to take steps to protect themselves from Party B, or a similar group, since the courts did not support them as expected.

Impact: Anyone who has acted in self-defense, and who responsibly reported the situation to the police and the courts, requesting that lawful action be taken, but was later denied a fair outcome, will receive a presidential pardon from me. This pardon will clear them of any wrongdoing, as their actions were taken only because they had no other choice.

Progress: I am committed to taking action and ensuring that the courts operate smoothly and efficiently, as our multinational partners expect high standards. This improvement is necessary to end the great challenges and hardship caused by previous leaders, whose actions led to political instability. Strengthening the Sri Lankan courts is vital to help ████████████████████████████████████████████ future.

3:45 AM

█████████████████████████████████████████ To my surprise, he showed me CCTV footage of some employees taking prawn products without permission.

I was debating with him, saying they probably haven't. I usually have a lot of trust in others, which isn't always best here. I worked with Shahim Fahmy to close a hole in the factory that was being used to move prawns out for sale.

It's truly unfortunate.

I have already emailed the police, and will start helping with the investigation, while visiting the registrar on Monday when they open.

I also talked to Thilanga about it on the phone.

He says I may have started a submission, so it's now marked as "Under Incorporation", which seems unusual.

And besides that, it’s not possible, because they don’t work on weekends, so they couldn’t have.

We have those trademarks and plenty of documentation, so the argument is that they can’t change those IT systems.

I believe Moshe Ledar visited this place.

He’s stayed at Checkpoint, HQ.

IT manager, that’s a busy job.

***

We could talk to the government, look into it carefully, and find out █████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

We’ll just handle it.