How to Make First Contact

First contact between civilizations has historically often ended badly for one side. The video argues that the civilization initiating contact has frequently dominated or destroyed the civilization receiving it. This raises the possibility that humanity should search for extraterrestrial civilizations before they discover us, although the historical comparison does not establish what alien contact would involve.

Humanity has spent decades searching for extraterrestrial life without confirming its existence. One proposed method is to examine the light emitted by distant stars for evidence of advanced technological activity.

Advanced civilizations may eventually need more energy than their home planets can provide. Human energy consumption has increased alongside technological development. The video assumes that extraterrestrial civilizations would face similar demands as they become more technologically sophisticated.

Physicist Freeman Dyson proposed that advanced civilizations might harvest energy directly from their stars. Rather than relying exclusively on planetary resources, such civilizations could deploy large numbers of orbiting satellites or collectors to capture stellar energy.

Energy collectors positioned closer to a star could capture substantially more energy than comparable collectors on a planet. As a civilization acquired more energy, it could manufacture additional satellites, gradually developing a vast network surrounding its star.

A Dyson swarm could provide an observable sign of extraterrestrial technology. Although telescopes cannot resolve individual satellites orbiting distant stars, a sufficiently large swarm might periodically obstruct starlight and produce unusual variations in the star's observed brightness.

Unusual stellar dimming could help astronomers identify candidates for extraterrestrial civilizations. The proposed search would focus on stars exhibiting significant, irregular changes in brightness that might indicate artificial structures blocking their light.

Tabby's Star, officially KIC 8462852, is presented as a possible example. Located in the Milky Way's constellation Cygnus, the star attracted attention because astronomers observed unusual irregularities in its brightness over several years.

Comets and surrounding debris were considered possible explanations for Tabby's Star's dimming. The video states that some astronomers questioned whether these natural explanations could account for the magnitude of the observed changes, leading to speculation about artificial orbiting structures.

The extraterrestrial explanation for Tabby's Star remains speculative. The video acknowledges that no alien structures have been established and that Dyson spheres are primarily a theoretical framework for considering how advanced civilizations might influence their environments.

Alien civilizations could potentially discover humanity through the same principle of detecting technological activity. Instead of observing the extraterrestrials themselves, either civilization might recognize the physical effects of another civilization's technology.

Humanity has deliberately sent information about itself into space aboard spacecraft. The Pioneer plaques were installed on two Pioneer probes traveling toward the outer reaches of the solar system, providing information intended for any extraterrestrial intelligence that might encounter them.

The Pioneer plaques contain a representation of hydrogen. Hydrogen was chosen because it is the universe's most abundant element and could provide a physical reference recognizable to an extraterrestrial civilization.

The plaques depict a human man and woman alongside the Pioneer spacecraft. The spacecraft provides a reference for estimating human size, while the human figures show aspects of human anatomy. The man's raised hand illustrates limb movement and the opposable thumb, rather than relying solely on its meaning as a greeting.

The plaques encode the Sun's location relative to 14 nearby pulsars. Their positioning information uses the hydrogen spin-flip transition frequency as a reference, providing a potentially universal scientific basis for locating humanity's home system.

The plaques also depict the solar system and the Pioneer spacecraft's approximate trajectory. This was intended to communicate where the probes originated and how they were traveling through space.

The Pioneer plaques assume extraterrestrials can recognize and interpret visual representations. Humans depend heavily on vision, but alien organisms might have poor eyesight, no vision, or no concept of using pictures to communicate information.

The arrow on the Pioneer plaque illustrates a major problem with designing messages for aliens. Its meaning depends on human experiences with arrows or pointing gestures. A civilization unfamiliar with those references might fail to recognize its intended meaning.

An extraterrestrial civilization could potentially mistake the plaque's arrow for a depiction of a weapon. The video suggests that a symbol intended to explain the spacecraft's trajectory could instead be interpreted as indicating hostile intentions.

Physical spacecraft are unlikely to provide humanity's first successful contact with extraterrestrials. Although later probes have carried additional visual messages, the probability of another civilization encountering one of a few small spacecraft in the vastness of space is extremely low.

Human radio transmissions offer another possible means of extraterrestrial discovery. Humanity has emitted radio signals for more than a century. Although most transmissions become too weak to detect across enormous distances, some signals travel into space and could potentially be detected by technologically advanced civilizations.

Humanity may already have transmitted its first message to extraterrestrials without intending to. A sufficiently advanced civilization could potentially detect radio emissions originating from Earth, even though those signals were never designed as deliberate communications.

The first evidence humanity receives of extraterrestrial intelligence could be a radio transmission. Detecting such a signal, however, would introduce a separate challenge: determining whether it contains a message and understanding what that message means.

Researchers would first need to identify the structure of an extraterrestrial transmission. A detected signal might use binary encoding, natural language, or an unfamiliar method of representing information. Recognizing which parts carry information would be an essential initial step.

Human languages exhibit recognizable statistical patterns in word frequency. The video estimates that the English word "the" accounts for approximately 7% of word occurrences, "be" for 3.5%, and "and" for 2.3%.

Word frequencies often follow a rank-based distribution known as Zipf's law. In the simplified relationship described, the second-most-common word appears approximately half as frequently as the most common, the third about one-third as frequently, and subsequent words follow a similar pattern.

Similar word-frequency distributions appear across languages with different historical origins. The video suggests that this recurring statistical pattern might also emerge in extraterrestrial languages, although that possibility remains unproven.

The Principle of Least Effort offers one proposed explanation for language-frequency patterns. The theory suggests that communication systems tend toward efficient arrangements, assigning frequently needed meanings to commonly used expressions rather than repeatedly requiring more complicated alternatives.

Statistical analysis might help distinguish an extraterrestrial language from other signals. By measuring the frequency of recurring sounds or symbols and comparing their distribution with known linguistic patterns, researchers might identify evidence that a transmission contains language.

Recognizing a signal as language would not establish what its words mean. Even if statistical analysis identified linguistic structure, scientists would still need to determine the meanings of individual symbols, expressions, and combinations.

Human languages share grammatical features that may not exist in extraterrestrial communication. The video identifies distinctions between nouns and verbs and other structural similarities found across human languages, including languages that developed independently.

Some researchers have proposed that humans possess an inherited framework for understanding language. Under this hypothesis, humans are biologically predisposed to recognize linguistic structures, while learning a particular language involves acquiring the elements that fit within that framework.

Animal communication suggests that human grammatical structures are not necessarily universal. The video argues that known animal communication systems do not demonstrate the same universal grammatical organization found in human languages.

An alien language might have no recognizable equivalent of human sentences. Researchers could not safely assume extraterrestrials organize information using familiar categories such as subjects, verbs, grammatical relationships, or even sentences themselves.

Deciphering extraterrestrial language would be harder than interpreting many ancient human languages. Linguists can often reconstruct historical languages by comparing them with related languages and examining archaeological, cultural, or written context.

An isolated extraterrestrial transmission might provide neither linguistic relatives nor useful context. Without comparable languages, bilingual inscriptions, shared objects, or knowledge of the transmitting civilization, assigning reliable meanings to unfamiliar expressions could be extraordinarily difficult.

Extraterrestrial communication might not involve spoken or written language at all. The video emphasizes that assuming aliens communicate through sound is itself a major and potentially misleading assumption.

Terrestrial animals demonstrate alternative forms of communication. Cuttlefish and chameleons can communicate through changes in body coloration, while ants and honeybees use chemical signals, including pheromones, to exchange information.

Even a successful word-for-word translation might fail to communicate the intended meaning. Understanding vocabulary is different from understanding the cultural, geographical, historical, and institutional references that give expressions their significance.

A French description of the Palais Bourbon illustrates the limits of literal translation. The example identifies the building associated with France's National Assembly and references the Quai d'Orsay, Paris's seventh arrondissement, and Place de la Concorde. A reader unfamiliar with French institutions and Parisian geography could understand the translated words while missing much of their significance.

A shared language does not guarantee a shared understanding of the world. Two individuals could recognize the same vocabulary but interpret a statement very differently because their experiences, environments, and cultural knowledge differ.

Philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein's observation about a speaking lion illustrates this difficulty. His statement, "If a lion could speak, we would not be able to understand him," is used to argue that communication requires more than the ability to recognize and translate words.

Explaining ordinary human activities to another intelligent species could require extensive background knowledge. The statement about taking an Uber to Starbucks for coffee depends on understanding cars, smartphones, applications, the internet, commercial establishments, money, and human habits.

Communication with extraterrestrials would require reconstructing an unfamiliar civilization's frame of reference. Even after deciphering its language, humanity might need to learn how that civilization understands objects, relationships, institutions, technology, and everyday experience before interpreting its messages accurately.

Physical contact with extraterrestrial beings might occur centuries or millennia after their initial detection. The video separates discovering evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, establishing communication, and eventually meeting another civilization as potentially distinct developments spanning extremely long periods.

An extraterrestrial civilization capable of reaching Earth would likely possess technology beyond humanity's current capabilities. Successful interstellar travel would demonstrate an ability that humans have not yet achieved. The video also raises faster-than-light travel as a speculative possibility rather than an established requirement.

Humanity might need to demonstrate its intelligence to visiting extraterrestrials. Despite our buildings, vehicles, artificial lighting, and other technological achievements, visitors might not automatically recognize those structures as products of deliberate intelligent activity.

Aliens might interpret human technology as part of Earth's natural environment. Without understanding how human societies construct and use objects, extraterrestrial visitors could potentially mistake buildings and other manufactured structures for naturally occurring features.

Mathematics is proposed as a potentially universal means of demonstrating intelligence. Unlike human languages and cultural symbols, mathematical relationships should remain valid regardless of the civilization observing them.

Basic arithmetic could establish that humanity understands abstract numerical relationships. The video proposes demonstrating examples such as two plus two equals four and four plus four equals eight, then continuing the sequence to establish a recognizable mathematical pattern.

The value of pi offers another example of a relationship independent of human culture. The ratio between a circle's circumference and diameter remains constant regardless of the symbols, language, or numerical notation used to describe it.

The Pythagorean theorem is presented as a particularly useful demonstration of human mathematical knowledge. The relationship states that, for a right triangle, the squares of the two shorter sides sum to the square of the hypotenuse: a² + b² = c².

The Pythagorean theorem can be demonstrated visually without relying on a shared spoken language. Squares divided into smaller equal units could be arranged along a right triangle's sides, showing that the combined areas of the two smaller squares equal the area of the largest square.

Demonstrating mathematical relationships could establish a foundation for communication between civilizations. The video argues that recognizing the same principles might allow humans and extraterrestrials to identify a common understanding of the physical universe, even without shared language or comparable technology.

Establishing common mathematical knowledge would not automatically resolve the wider problems of communication. Mathematical demonstrations could show intelligence and shared scientific understanding, but the earlier difficulties involving unfamiliar languages and cultural references would remain.

The video leaves humanity's first question to an extraterrestrial unanswered. After considering detection, translation, cultural understanding, and physical contact, it asks what a human representative should say first, emphasizing that identifying another intelligence is only the beginning of meaningful contact.

Wendover Productions disclosed that its videos involve several direct production expenses. The creator identified stock footage, music, sound design, software, hardware, and personal production time as costs associated with creating the channel's videos.

The creator stated that Patreon contributions were used entirely for channel expenses. He claimed that none of the contributed money was paid to him personally and that monthly expense reports were published to account for how supporters' funds were spent.

Wendover Productions also used merchandise and supporter benefits to help finance production. These included early video access, stickers, handwritten letters, and T-shirts, which were also offered separately for $20.