Should liberals donate more to humanitarian causes? Sure. But compassion isn’t a liberal impulse — it’s a human one. It was evangelicals and Republicans who in 2003 started the single best aid program ever, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR; it has saved more than 26 million lives so far. Some of the most heroic aid workers I’ve met in dangerous locations have been Christian missionaries, from nuns to doctors; they would dispute the idea that empathy is woke.
- Did you pay for Haiti's song with Michael Jackson, the Venezuela people had an earthquake recently, they will be better served with honest leadership
- The liberals, can join in to help, but they can't be liberals, why should any LGBT figure, help a Kenyan president, who balks at Obama, over gay rights?
- A cruel power, and an evil, is dying, so that goodness can prevail, we must not sustain them, they are impoverished on their cursed hearts--not us
- They can keep blaming us all, for their own problems
It’s reasonable to ask how much we should spend or how we should reform the system. But why would anyone begrudge $2 bed nets or $4 malaria vaccines to save children’s lives?
So let me offer a challenge to Musk: Come with me on a reporting trip to South Sudan or Somalia or Mozambique. Meet starving children whose lives can be easily saved. Hold them. Look into their eyes. Talk to their terrified moms.
You’ll understand that these kids are just like ours, except that they didn’t do as well in the lottery of birth — and that just because we can’t save every child’s life doesn’t mean we should save none of them.
- Elon changed his mind on Israel, visiting, but that's also why he hates terrorists, and we can't tolerate the lunatics of South Sudan, Somalia and Mozambique, they need an owner, to buy them out, to save them
- They can't keep pushing up, some corrupt leader, to make deals, representing them as beggars, that's never going to save them
- God doesn't and won't save lost souls who worship the enemy