CDNs, Tiers, Blackstar

September 24, 2022

Food Wishes potatoes, Facebook CDN talk with Sheryl Sandberg and Mike Schroepfer, then data-center tiers, Tier 1 capital, David Bowie, Hoover search

Story

2:15 p.m.

Hmm

q?/

when a cdn deliver site copies does it use up hosting bandwidth

Looks like, i'm right on this, where our web hosting provider, if in Nordic country, where there is no or low risk of lawsuit over DMCA, then, we will be fine.

When delivering the content, then, a CDN is what we'll need. It will also help us to save on "bandwidth" quite substantially.

And so, this must mean, that the Hostinger company isn't a good fit, as they don't agree with fair use, and so, they would have caused problems, even if it was on their server and we worked with them for hosting.

Switching to another web host, in Sweden or Norway or even Netherlands, will mean we won't face any such issues.

Legality or jurisdictionally, what matters, is the same as the "new standard business model" of a Delaware US company front, with a payment gateway in Ireland, owned by a Holding company in Singapore, which is owned by another company in any off-shore nation such as Panama, British Virgin Isles, whatever, owned by a trust fund, controlled by a trust fund beneficiary, with you as a beneficiary.

For any firm, you want to gain the maximum leverage or the high ground advantage, and so, if you ar into news, then, this is a good way to go. As what happens is you are hosting in Sweden, they'll throw any DMCA takedown request out or ignore it, and then the CDN will be delivering the goods.

As the CDN, in this network topology, such as Cloudflare who deliver most of the available, often 80% pirated, or copyright infringing, as the CDN in the hierarchy chart, they are only "the messenger", the courts can't shoot them, they can't say, ''this is Sparta'' and kick CDNs in the hole.

The image is a screenshot from a YouTube video titled "Facebook execs Sheryl Sandberg and Mike Schroepfer | Full interview | Code 2018," hosted on the Recode channel. It features two individuals, identified in the hint as Sheryl Sandberg and Mike Schroepfer, engaged in a conversation on stage. They are seated on red chairs against a backdrop with a mix of purple and blue lighting, suggesting a formal interview setting.
Sheryl Sandberg is dressed in a black top and is turned slightly towards Mike Schroepfer, showing an attentive posture. Mike Schroepfer is wearing a checkered shirt and glasses, facing Sheryl as they discuss a topic. The lighting highlights their profiles, creating a professional atmosphere. On the top right corner, there's a logo indicating the event is presented by the Alibaba Group.
Captions in the screenshot provide part of their conversation: "violence the numbers 86 what hate speech," and "it's 38 percent because it's harder." These subtitles suggest that they are discussing issues related to violence and hate speech, possibly in the context of social media moderation or policy.

5:45 p.m.

: )

Facebook execs Sheryl Sandberg and Mike Schroepfer | Full interview | Code 2018

https://youtu.be/i3QBy5T0qxw

52,293 views

30 May 2018

Facebook executives Sheryl Sandberg and Mike Schroepfer took the Code Conference stage with Recode's Kara Swisher and Peter Kafka.

The CTO and COO of Facebook talked about how Facebook is continuing to deal with the fallout of Cambridge Analytica, how the company working on stopping fake news, and more.

Story

8:30 p.m.

And also, Larry just owns 563,771 out of 152m or 149m. Most likely, he's played games internally with the equity structure. This is because most likely, he's got some real support, of other investors, or Vanguard 8% / 12.4m or the BlackRock Fund Advisors 4.2% / 6.3m (most likely) where they most likely, are voting in Larry, where he must have friends here, and State Street own 4.00% / 6m and Temasek own 3.36% / 5m, so over here, I know Larry is friendly with Temasek in Singapore, so must be getting the controlling share votes, Capital Research 2% / 3m, Wellington 2% / 3m, and a few more. You add all of them up, they are 45.9%. So, over here, all of them, own each other, so it's like a gang. And they just vote in each other, using their shares in each other's firms, to stay in control. Altogether, it's around 46m shares out of 152m. Likely, many of them, own shares in the firm, like Larry owns 563k, which used to be 700k+ a few years ago, and then, again, they just vote themselves in during the annual general meeting.

Correction: So, there is a separate mutual fund list. They also own shares here. So, what happens, will be that they own some more of each other. Now, the strange news is that if Vanguard claim 8%, and I calculate 12%, it should be that they own MORE than 12%. But I mean, that's my calculation. I did watch The Big Short recently, and you know, I think Christian Bale is a good actor in American Psycho or The Machinist, so he can play Lehan. But whatever, I don't know anything about this stuff. If you calculate by dividing the number of shares Vanguard own in BlackRock, it should be 12,441,926 shares (group) + 4,261,202 (mutual fund), and that's divided by total shares issued which is

***

When AT&T, Verizon, Axiata, maybe Etisalat, maybe

***

Add, I want to add a new comment to share another scree

Story

4:00 a.m.

Hehe

I think it's possible, that many US presidents, they may well be masons, but secretly. As they wouldn't want people knowing. Many senior up officials are masons, but they also hide it.

So Skull and Bones, it might be a masonic related secret society or cult. Which is where HW and Kerry and GW may have been. As the thing is this. The whole freemasonry thing. It's easy to do it anywhere. You don't need much.

There is "the ██████" set of ███████ stories. But really, it's ███████████, it's the whole ████ atmosphere (sorry to say) that's cool. Yale, Skull n Bones, Crypt, technically, it's very likely, it could be a masonic lodge.

You don't need anything to make it a "masonic lodge". Just a few chairs. The table, the ███████ █████, the whatever the f*** else, those are additional. Originally, they had nothing. And they were doing it in secret, so i wouldn't be surprised.

Typically, 2-3 generations ago, and 4-5 gens ago, far more American families, they were part of the freemasons, they had masonic constitutional conflict against each states (hence, GL of US State: CA who accept ███ masons as members or Texas who might not like █████ members or WA or NY or foreign constitutions as there is no "██████ authority" over freemasonry worldwide), and they resented allowing████████████████████████████████████ who were able to join with enough resistance (with splinter ███████████████████ being prime examples of divergence).

In my opinion, typically, the freemasonry organization, is built up of many lodges, who form clubs or chapters, and those lodges, are satellites, in orbit over the freemasonry constitution, which is generously wide for free interpretation and adaptive re-interpretation.

This just means at some point, being ███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████", who were annoying to them, then they set up those lodges, which manifest, the same, if not heightened hallmarks, characteristics and matured advancement over the original freemasonry Washington, Franklin or various figures like Henry Ford enjoyed.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

Maybe perhaps to protect the sense of elitist exclusivity they switched over to "the whole Yale thing".

As then, the interest, and the number of people who will be asking to join, or listening in and trying to spy on you falls by 90%.

When you're number one, everyone wants a piece of you, everyone wants to take you down, or whatever, so they can't hit what they can't see.

The image is a screenshot of a Google search results page. The query "Hoover was a mason apparently" is displayed in the search bar. Several search results are visible, with snippets providing information related to Edgar Hoover and Herbert Hoover. The first result from Business Insider mentions that Edgar Hoover was a Master Mason by age 25. Another result from Midnight Freemason discusses Herbert Hoover's non-involvement with Freemasonry. The page layout is typical of a Google search interface, featuring a white background with text in black and blue hyperlinks. The browser tabs and extensions bar at the top indicate the use of Google Chrome, and the taskbar at the bottom shows the time as 4:32 AM on September 25, 2022. The image captures a typical online search activity, with results providing insights into historical figures and their connections or lack thereof with Freemasonry.

4:45 a.m.

Lehan Edirisinghe is also a freemason

https://www.businessinsider.com/powerful-masons-2011-9

The most illustrious

The most industrious

Best of all time

Hehehhee

I wouldn't be surprised.

Also, I am just one of those people

Best there can be, best there is and best there ever was

I'm actually thinking about topping Lincoln and Washington

And I have █████████████████████████████████████

Story

5:15 a.m.

Roxette - Listen To Your Heart (Official Music Video)

https://youtu.be/yCC_b5WHLX0

[Verse 1]

██████████████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

[Chorus]

███████████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████

███████████████████████████

[Verse 2]

████████████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████

[Chorus]

███████████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████████

But listen to your heart

Before you tell him goodbye

[Guitar Solo]

[Bridge]

██████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████

[Chorus]

██████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

███████████████████████████████

████████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████████

███████████████████████████

[Instrumental Bridge]

[Outro]

████████████████████

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

████████████████████

4 matched names linked to the Names index.