2:15 p.m.
Hmm
q?/
when a cdn deliver site copies does it use up hosting bandwidth
Looks like, i'm right on this, where our web hosting provider, if in Nordic country, where there is no or low risk of lawsuit over DMCA, then, we will be fine.
When delivering the content, then, a CDN is what we'll need. It will also help us to save on "bandwidth" quite substantially.
And so, this must mean, that the Hostinger company isn't a good fit, as they don't agree with fair use, and so, they would have caused problems, even if it was on their server and we worked with them for hosting.
Switching to another web host, in Sweden or Norway or even Netherlands, will mean we won't face any such issues.
Legality or jurisdictionally, what matters, is the same as the "new standard business model" of a Delaware US company front, with a payment gateway in Ireland, owned by a Holding company in Singapore, which is owned by another company in any off-shore nation such as Panama, British Virgin Isles, whatever, owned by a trust fund, controlled by a trust fund beneficiary, with you as a beneficiary.
For any firm, you want to gain the maximum leverage or the high ground advantage, and so, if you ar into news, then, this is a good way to go. As what happens is you are hosting in Sweden, they'll throw any DMCA takedown request out or ignore it, and then the CDN will be delivering the goods.
As the CDN, in this network topology, such as Cloudflare who deliver most of the ████ available, often 80% pirated, or copyright infringing, as the CDN in the hierarchy chart, they are only "the messenger", the courts can't shoot them, they can't say, ''this is Sparta'' and kick CDNs in the hole.
