April 23, 2023

2:15 PM

Hunger, Family Estrangement and Choosing Expert-Led Government

2:00 p.m.

I had my lunch. It's terrible, but can manage. I don't get enough calories. I only get 2 meals. I don't have any money to buy food. I think I'm getting 1,200 or 1,500 calories a day instead of 2,500. I have asked for help, didn't get any. Lehara was commenting on my opinions on Facebook. So pathetic, no? They have absolutely no relevance, their only moments of fame are when they participate in my life or interact with me. Like Taylor Swift's kids, growing up Swiftly, it's pathetic.

I told her very clearly, that we don't want to have each other in our lives, and want to move on and away, and out, and not keep in touch. I think her father Palith, and mum Shanika, couldn't see very far, so they sealed her fate. It's better for someone to be allowed to gamble at a casino to lose and suffer, than to forcibly save them, only for them to curse and attack you. You need to learn to let people die, as that's their freedom, and you benefit, this is the secret to life. I don't think any of my family or friends will get any political authority, unlike with rival politicians, who all seem desperate to interfere with functionings of government corruptly.

Milan is upset I didn't support his drug dealing business lol. I told him he'd be in jail, and he's learning to accept people won't agree. There's people like this. Most people in countries like India are that way anyway. I think best thing to do is send Milan a letter formally describing this and publish it. I can refer to this, so he can get some closure as to my view on it. Always put things in writing.

I claimed to my mum Kanchana Ratwatte is my designated lawyer. He's a pretty honest seeming person. I doubt he'd make any serious mistakes. I think he can get this stupid "Edna case" behind us. Or handle my angle in this. I do often think about Lal, what I plan to do to Deepa, to get justice for 35,000 ETI Finance depositors. I most likely will do something. It's a small, petty sum of money. I think to show my power, I'll do that for the fun of it.

I guess, as we need to coordinate with Lal side, we should use Kanchana, as he's a pretty straight guy unlike ████████ who is extremely dishonest, as his handshake, word and name means nothing. I saw Ali Sabry, that guy's also crazy. I doubt anyone takes him seriously, they see him as some dude who helped Gota, got some support, mindlessly greenlit or said yes sir to everything Gotabaya did thereafter. Which is really stupid. I think Ali Sabry and the rest of the ministers often only do what Gota or the president decide on doing.

I hate it and don't tolerate it when Imtiyaz Gaffoor or anyone else stupidly does that with. "No, ███████ is not qualified, Yes, Mein Lëhan, we will put her in, we'll help her, give her a life, she develop her life and contacts, she's a Muslim, so sure boss, I'll put her in as deputy chair". I guess, I never do it. I often ask people to lead things and do things on their own and despise having to micro manage anything, I never like doing it, as it means the people can't lead themselves.

That's why I always hire or appoint people with knowledge in the field to lead it. I don't believe parliamentarians people pick, can do this. In Yes Minister, or Yes, PM, the secretary, Nigel Hawthorne, is quite a good secretary, who is not very good at any field, but is good at bureaucracy. I guess, it's not good. I wouldn't want that. The PM was a dud. Those British have an infamously mediocre government. They have earned a lot during colonial era, they're sustaining the economy with good, resourceful management of the nation, with steady income from education, from business, but it's not doing very well, they're not going to do things.

It takes a president in the US, with his or her secretaries, to do things. That way, they have people who know the subject material. Thank G-d Hillary didn't win the election. Jeez, she was a mess. I think Ivanka is a better person. But she's also not very tough. I think Sandberg can do it, but Sandberg has made a number of mistakes, where she can likely face political attacks.

██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████but if she tries to be the queen, and she's only allowed to be Typhoid (Queen) Mary of Surveillance Capitalism, she'll likely be knocked down or denied, she certainly won't be allowed to be president. She can be my PM, I can appoint her. It's a good solution. I think even Zuck, Schmidt, they wouldn't be so good. Elon Musk got knocked down, but otherwise he's a good pick.

██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████. ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

3:00 PM

Cybersecurity Strategy, Political Reputation and Religious History

3:00 p.m.

I think while I have the good judgement to order US cyber firms to do business, especially remote pen testing with Russia or China, or even enemies like Iran, the people running those cyber firms left to their own devices, wouldn't have the strong leadership needed to make those wise calls.

This is what happened with Synack. It was a real disaster. Jim Hyman, COO, this guy, Ron Peeters, Simon Haylock, this Steven Soper, they were really stupid. This is why people in America would vote for Obama to run the office of president or myself, over any of them, whom i would appoint to run my state department or defense department, and report to myself, because I'm a better leader, who is a lot more farthinking. A lot more serious.

I think at the same time. I think that Iran, Russia and China, maybe I don't know, I wouldn't do it now. But Sri Lanka, yes. I'm very conniving. I don't know. I think maybe I would've prohibited, blacklisted all of them for longer term interests. I'd opportunistically mess with China over Taiwan. Just for the larger scale business, of f***ing or anticompetitively disqualifying and sanctioning the $19t Chinese competitor to my American superpower status.

China wouldn't continue to enjoy their economic enjoyment any longer when in conflict with US for real over this small, otherwise irrelevant island of Taiwan that belongs to China anyway. It's a small, tiny line in the sea, that JFK refused to fire nukes upon Russia crossing by mistake. This is a small, thing, that will be used, to make a big deal out of, to justify sanctioning China badly.

Which is why I'm reluctant to do anything to Lal. People will say I did it, then I'll lose credibility or respect, as you trade on the reputation for politics. Endlessly, people will remind me that I helped 35,000 get justice. So I have to do that, pick the hay field, plan out Cain's work, very cautiously. I also see this more like, we're dealing with uncle Scar, and not helping him with hyenas, as I don't want to be gruesomely killed by the hyenas myself.

See, if I was G-d, I wouldn't do this mistake of Job. It destroys my credibility. People will say I can't protect my people. Or myself. Or I'm not a hero. Or anti hero. You'll fast be running out of patience rooting for myself in our Sri Lanka story. As Satan asked Jesus to jump off the cliff, but he replied it's wrong to test G-d, as G-d may test us as our invigilator. I think if I did go do it, the damage is that I'll end up being seen as imperfect. That I've killed someone.

I'm a murderer then, like JR who killed innocent Tamils to strike fear or his family or siblings (I think the brother, although suppressed) to grab some plots of land. I think the best I can do is this. Plus, those Biblical stories were re written repeatedly from Mesopotamia. You must be smarter than this. I think as old testament is Jewish, and borrowed heavily from Mesopotamia, that, anyway you must then follow the pluralistic G-d theory, upon which you determine that satan or samael is the darker side, of the one G-d.

So, it's not really, Satan or the adversary, but G-d's insecurity, or wondering if Job really loved him, or (as a rich man, like Hefner ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████) his money or his prestige or the benefits that come with his crowning association. This insecurity, is what led G-d in to attacking and killing Job, although all knowingly, seeing the future, he knew, and only did so to tell the story. I of course, don't wish to make this happen, and wish instead to avoid it.

I think that in ancient mesopotamia, they had parallels with egyptians, although they had better ties with Indus (Hindu) and Saraswati River Valley. As India enjoys friendship with Israel, better so, than Israel has strained ties with their Moslem friends like the Saudis who ironically share more in common in the way of their religious beliefs. The Buddhists or jains were merely offshoots, trying to improve upon Hindu ideology, it's the early forms of factionally breakaway faked atheism, which they developed into eventually.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

This is a major reason why the religion is a minority, even with a good track record. As Christianity is a lot more realistic and constructive, and even Islam or Hindu isn't as destructive████████████████████████████████████ Japan is the only country that succeeded by having some Tamil monk change it to mean anyone can be a bodhisattva, and so, they had a more sustainable approach to it. ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ In Thailand, the monks are very happy, but the place is not so great. You might struggle to see this with personal cognitive, and collective social bias, █████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

The Egyptians, developed their gods first, they developed into ancient greek gods, who then 1,000 years later, turned into the roman gods, who closely resemble the greek gods, and indeed, in showcasing the influence or how differences occur along the ages, the egyptian equivalents and their stories.

The ancient greeks, like Zeus, his name just changed to Jupiter in roman reinterpretation, but the story is still the same. The story that the guy's going around having sex with the humans is Mesopotamian in origin and is a tale as old as time, as far as we can remember. This pisses off his wife, like with Hercules story, this Hera, and there's drama as people even then, loved this theme in storytelling. This story was based off Mesopotamia, it is a merger, as these beliefs unify in relative terms as people seek unity instinctively, to be right, or better yet, to not be wrong, as they believed this.

This and story of Horus, Kimba, this is what led to Jesus' narrative, which is why ███████████████████████████, and the romans, soon adopted what was familiar to them, as is common, as they wished to adopt the mesopotamian and hammurabi traditions. It's as simple as this. It warped into. There's nothing much to it. People are stupid, you can easily round them up and get them to do anything. They will often herd up and do things because everyone else is doing it.

4:45 PM

Setting Performance Standards for Government Appointees

4:45 p.m.

Who the f*** is thilanga? or this shavendra guy? They haven't done anything for the country. They're like this ████████ fellow, will get a $295m bribe, sell out the country for billions of losses, then pathetically claim that the guy has built a bus stop with his own funds, or like Sajith, with unexplained money, has bought some buses to gift the people stupid enough to accept this as valuable.

██████████ some gangster, who's apparently killed a few people using hitmen although this isn't proven as was likely ███████████ attempts to frame him using her uncle ██████████████████ and drug dealer ████████ in an attempt to make herself seem a better pick for my speaker than Thilanga, he runs some betting franchise, isn't really able to do anything. It doesn't take any brains to run a casino or a textile factory, or sweatshop, it takes cruelty. The guy's often characterized or personified by his newspaper Lakbima, where they lied endlessly, nobody bought the paper like Tiran Alles (Sajith's guy and go-betweener to Rajapaksa), then he's shored up or used the betting funds or income to pay for his loss making newspaper for years. He's like that guy in Citizen Kane.

Shavendra's just some war criminal banned with his wife Sujeewa and the two kids by the state department. I don't take them seriously. Although, I'd have asked him to do the same thing, or worse, a lot sooner than it took Gotabaya to do it. I think they all know that. We can't afford to be seen as a pariah state by having them represent us, so I'll ask anyone else to deal with the foreigners even if i choose to appoint them at my personal discretion after much consideration and advice from my think tanks, partners and team.

I think if they don't do what I ask, I'll sack them, and appoint anyone else. More importantly, it doesn't even matter, I'll sack them openly if they don't meet our goals, as those departments are business interest lobbies for myself, to enfranchise and direct economic growth. I'll fire any of the state assets' people, if they don't get the results we need. I refuse to hire and otherwise fire or replace people who are recommended in good standing and good rapport by the domain experts running their ascribed ministries relevant to the field when their proposed strategy isn't likely to work or working as depicted by actual results, but usually not over their judgement as leaders or personal activity or even performance in most cases as we fundamentally can't ascertain speculated market environments with certainty. I guess, firing over poor performance isn't fair, but we will see, they can't be fired if their strategy is good, but they can be replaced by more practical, resourceful leaders, who have better insight or judgement. But it's again unlikely, as the state assets people are all respected leaders who have field expertise and likely can produce results in close concert with our local firms.

I can't be Thilanga's father, it's too much of a hassle, I can't be spoon feeding that██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ We have serious KPIs and if they can't meet those benchmarks, especially certain performance metrics or even some financial ratios, we can't keep them on board, they have to be replaced. This is because we're going into this with research or evidence backed goals, to deploy proven strategies which are effective, to net results, that our people and voters choose us as their representatives to deliver.

1:30 AM

Air Conditioning, Hirshon and a Fair Profit Split

1:15 a.m. (e)

Whatever.

Let's be cool.

Tomorrow, or today actually, we're doing a new check to see what ac to get, then getting some ac soon.

Hopefully today, we can get it done, so I won't be sweating.

This guy, I think Hirshon, unlike

Actually, yes, just like Eduardo Saverin

See, Zuckerberg, even though I'm exactly like him

I'm not like Lal to betray or try to steal (like his wife Deepa has apparently), in such a stupid way, where I run those kinds of survival risks because I stole $100m off 35,000 (ETI Finance)

I think because Hirshon has shown a lot of respect, despite him not being able to see or understand and be decisive

Maybe Jonathan didn't understand sincerely

Because it's unfair for him to expect these people would try it

He's a naive person as Hank would tell that main character in Breaking Bad

Very naive

I think if I was Zuckerberg, and Hirshon is Saverin.

I'd actually be happy he's got $10b

But unlike 5%, I am very happy to give 10% of the recurrent profits, while I'll keep 10%, we can pay like 30% to our strategic investors

But what I originally thought was to be 80%, now 50%, will go to our team

So they're rich

I don't think I can live with f***ing over anyone in my life

I think it's uncool, and I always need to know that I'm a very cool person