How parents are being held responsible after school shootings

Watch Facts Elle's

Key takeaways

  • Fifteen-year-old Ethan Crumbley killed four classmates at Oxford High in 2021 after months of warning signs went unanswered. Hours before the attack, his worksheet contained an explicit plea for help; after a 12-minute meeting, his parents refused the counselor’s advice to take him home, citing work, and staff never searched his backpack.

    “The thoughts won't stop. Help me. Blood everywhere.” — Crumbley’s worksheet

  • His parents had helped give him access to the weapon despite those warnings. His father bought him the 9mm as an early Christmas present, his mother took him shooting three days before the attack, and after a teacher reported ammunition searches she told him not to get caught.

    “You have to learn not to get caught.” — Crumbley’s mother, in a text to him

  • Both parents became the first in the United States convicted for a mass school shooting committed by their child. Each received at least 10 years for four involuntary manslaughter counts tied to failing to secure the gun and ignoring warning signs; Ethan pleaded guilty and received life.
  • Oxford’s school failed to follow threat-assessment procedures, but government immunity blocked victims’ lawsuits against the district. Guidepost found teachers had raised concerns appropriately but the school failed its protocols; about 70 of 161 interview requests were refused or unanswered, including two employees who met Crumbley hours before the attack.

    “This tragedy was avoidable.” — Guidepost investigators

  • More than 90% of school mass shooters broadcast their plans before attacking. In a decade of research, criminologists James Densley and Jillian Peterson also found recurring histories of childhood violence, neglect and domestic violence, while every shooter they interviewed said someone could have stopped them.

    “I think anyone could have stopped me.” — One shooter interviewed by the researchers

  • Researchers say prevention means drawing troubled students into support, not relying on visible security. They call metal detectors, clear backpacks and drills largely theatrical, favour coordinated mental-health and crisis services, and are piloting Minnesota training to help staff identify students in crisis.

    “The best thing we can do to prevent violence is not to push kids out, it's actually pull them in.” — Researcher

  • Federal funding for school mental-health services has been sharply reduced. Congress approved $1 billion in bipartisan grants after Uvalde, but most was discontinued last April; in December, the Department of Education awarded $208 million for credentialed providers, a fraction of the original amount.

    “The programs conflicted with the administration's priorities.” — Department of Education

  • A Georgia prosecution is testing whether parents can be held responsible for another school shooting. The father of the accused Apalachee High gunman is on trial in Barrow County over the 2024 attack that killed four, with prosecutors alleging he ignored warning signs; the broadcast reports 84 school mass shootings since Columbine.

All points

1974 words

- The United States has experienced 84 mass shootings at schools since Columbine in 1999. The programme argues that the political response has become predictable: condolences, partisan arguments and ultimately little action to prevent another tragedy.

- A new prosecution in Georgia is testing whether parents can be held responsible for school shootings committed by their children. The father of an accused teenage gunman has been on trial for two weeks in Barrow County over the 2024 Apalachee High School shooting in Winder, Georgia, which killed four people. Prosecutors allege that he ignored warning signs about his son. The broadcast presents this as a continuation of the legal precedent established in Michigan.

- The Oxford High School shooting in Michigan became the first case in which parents were criminally convicted for their child's mass school shooting. In November 2021, a 15-year-old student, Ethan Crumbley, opened fire at Oxford High School, approximately 40 miles north of Detroit, killing four classmates with a 9mm handgun.

- Two of the Oxford victims are remembered by name and for their contributions to the school community. Tate Myre, 16, was a star athlete and student mentor. Hana St. Juliana, 14, was only three months into her freshman year. Families described Hana as someone remembered for her smile and laughter, and Tate as a young person with an extraordinary zest for life.

- Families of Oxford's victims believe America is moving backwards on school shooting prevention. Interviewees argued that legislative efforts to improve mental health support and gun control are being reversed rather than strengthened. They want greater emphasis on preventing attacks before they happen.

- Ethan Crumbley had displayed warning signs for months before the shooting. Prosecutors said he repeatedly texted his mother about seeing demons inside the family home. Three months before the attack, he texted a friend that it was time to shoot up the school, then claimed he was joking.

- A teacher reported that Crumbley was researching ammunition online the day before the shooting. The teacher emailed school administrators after seeing him looking at different bullets during class. An administrator left his mother a voicemail, which she did not return. She subsequently texted her son: "LOL, I'm not mad. You have to learn not to get caught."

- The morning of the shooting, Crumbley's schoolwork contained an explicit plea for help alongside violent drawings. His mathematics worksheet showed a gun, a bullet and a bleeding person. It also contained the words: "The thoughts won't stop. Help me. Blood everywhere."

- The school counselor recommended therapy and taking Crumbley home, but his parents refused. His parents were called to the school after the disturbing worksheet was discovered. The counselor testified that he recommended professional help and suggested they take their son home, but they declined, citing work commitments. The meeting lasted approximately 12 minutes.

- The school allowed Crumbley to return to class without checking his backpack. Two hours after the meeting, surveillance footage showed him entering a bathroom, removing a handgun from his backpack and beginning his attack in the hallway. Investigators subsequently found his journal on the bathroom floor, documenting his desire and plan to shoot his classmates.

- Crumbley's parents had also facilitated his access to the murder weapon despite the warning signs. His father had purchased the 9mm handgun as an early Christmas present, and his mother had taken him to a shooting range with it just three days before the attack. One interviewee argued that shooting sports are not inherently problematic, but buying a gun and taking a child shooting when that child is clearly in crisis represents a catastrophic failure of judgment.

- Crumbley pleaded guilty to all charges and received a life sentence. Prosecutors nevertheless argued that the shooter was not the only person responsible for the deaths.

- Both of Crumbley's parents were convicted of four counts of involuntary manslaughter. The convictions concerned their failure to secure the firearm and their disregard of warning signs about their son's mental health crisis. Each received a prison sentence of at least 10 years.

- The Oxford convictions established a national legal precedent. They were the first convictions anywhere in the United States holding parents criminally responsible for a mass school shooting committed by their child. Prosecutors argued that parental accountability was one of the few available avenues when broader society and political institutions had failed to take meaningful protective action.

- The school itself escaped equivalent accountability, despite having received multiple warnings. An interviewee argued that the school had a responsibility to protect children and that its counseling office mishandled a student who was visibly in crisis and already had access to a gun. The criticism was that the shooter and his parents faced criminal consequences, while the institution that had the opportunity to intervene did not.

- Lawsuits against Oxford school officials and the district were dismissed under Michigan's government immunity laws. These laws protect public entities and their employees from certain lawsuits. Victims' families argued that immunity had discouraged meaningful investigation and prosecution because officials believed legal action would be futile.

- Families had to fight to obtain an investigation into the school's conduct. Interviewees described how immunity created a situation in which law enforcement and prosecutors were reluctant to pursue investigations or charges against protected public institutions. They rejected the argument that overstretched schools should be excused from responsibility, insisting that the Oxford shooting was preventable.

- The United States has no national standard requiring independent investigations after school shootings. There are no federal mandates requiring states to conduct reviews or investigations. The FBI is typically required to investigate when an incident is classified as an act of terrorism or a hate crime, leaving no equivalent general requirement for school shooting investigations.

- Oxford's school board eventually hired Guidepost Solutions following months of community pressure. The private security firm was commissioned to conduct an independent investigation into the shooting and the school's handling of warning signs.

- Guidepost encountered substantial resistance when attempting to interview school personnel. The firm requested interviews with 161 people, but approximately 70 refused or failed to respond. Those included two school employees who had met with Crumbley just hours before the shooting.

- The school district and Guidepost disagreed about whether existing court testimony was sufficient. The district said many staff members had already provided depositions during court proceedings. Guidepost maintained that those depositions did not answer all the questions its investigators needed to resolve.

- Guidepost distinguished between teachers who raised concerns appropriately and the school's failure to follow threat-assessment procedures. Investigators concluded that teachers had acted appropriately by immediately reporting their concerns. However, they faulted the school for failing to follow established threat-assessment protocols, explicitly concluding: "This tragedy was avoidable."

- Michigan's Attorney General was investigating the matter at the time of the broadcast. This represented a further avenue for examining institutional failures beyond the criminal cases against the shooter and his parents.

- Criminologists James Densley and Jillian Peterson argue that America lacks the coordinated response to mass shootings that followed September 11. Both are professors of criminology and founders of the Violence Prevention Project, a Minnesota-based nonprofit studying mass shootings. They compared the extensive counterterrorism infrastructure created after 9/11 with the absence of equivalent urgency, coordination and institutional infrastructure around mass shootings.

- The researchers believe political disagreement has repeatedly prevented effective prevention measures. They described a pattern in which imperfect solutions are pitted against one another, nobody agrees on a comprehensive approach, and the resulting disagreement produces inaction. They argue that the country needs a definitive, repeatable prevention framework that other institutions can adopt.

- Densley and Peterson have spent approximately 10 years studying hundreds of mass shootings. Their research includes interviews with people who knew the perpetrators as well as interviews with the shooters themselves. Their objective is to understand how individuals develop pathways towards violence and identify opportunities to interrupt them.

- Their research identifies early childhood violence and neglect as recurring background factors. Significant childhood exposure to violence, domestic violence within the home and neglect appeared repeatedly in the histories of the perpetrators they studied. The researchers described these experiences as potential foundations for later violent behaviour.

- Every mass shooter interviewed by the researchers said someone could have stopped them. Densley said he asked every perpetrator whether there was anyone or anything that could have prevented the attack. All answered yes. One went further, saying that he believed anyone could have stopped him.

- More than 90% of school mass shooters broadcast their intentions before attacking. According to the researchers, perpetrators communicated their plans either online or directly to other people. This suggests that warning information frequently exists before an attack, creating opportunities for intervention.

- The shooters in Parkland, Uvalde and Apalachee High had communicated their intentions before their attacks. The researchers cited these cases as examples of perpetrators telling other people what they intended to do before carrying out the shootings.

- Feelings of isolation, hopelessness and the desire for notoriety are recurring motivations. The researchers explained that some perpetrators want to be seen and recognised, even through destructive behaviour. For individuals who feel invisible, infamy can become a distorted form of recognition.

- Schools often invest in visible security measures that do little to prevent attacks by their own students. Metal detectors, clear backpacks and lockdown drills can create reassurance, but the researchers described much of this approach as theatrical. When the perpetrator is already a student with access to the school, these measures may do little to identify or stop the developing threat.

- The researchers favour investment in coordinated prevention rather than relying primarily on physical security. They recommend better communication between school teams, school-based mental health services, crisis intervention and suicide prevention. They argue that the evidence repeatedly supports these approaches as more useful for preventing violence.

- Effective prevention requires bringing troubled students closer to support rather than excluding them. The researchers' principle is that schools should pull vulnerable students in, not push them out. Identifying children in crisis and connecting them with appropriate services offers an opportunity to intervene before their problems escalate.

- Densley and Peterson are participating in a Minnesota pilot programme to improve early intervention. The initiative trains school staff to recognise students in crisis and connect them with support services. It is an example of the coordinated, prevention-focused approach the researchers believe should become more widespread.

- Congress approved approximately $1 billion in school mental health grants in a bipartisan 2022 initiative following the Uvalde shooting. The funding was intended to expand mental health services in schools and improve access to qualified support.

- Most of that federal school mental health funding was subsequently discontinued. The Department of Education explained that the programmes conflicted with the administration's priorities. The reversal weakened a major funding initiative intended to improve school-based mental health support.

- The Department of Education awarded $208 million for credentialed school mental health providers in December. This was only a fraction of the original billion-dollar funding commitment, illustrating the difference between the scale of the initial initiative and the smaller amount subsequently awarded.

- The programme argues that gun violence is the leading cause of death among American children. An interviewee rejected the idea that school shootings and gun violence are simply unavoidable features of American life, arguing that the country has the ability to make substantial progress through prevention.

- The central unresolved problem is not a lack of warning signs, but the repeated failure to act on them. Oxford demonstrated how information about a student's deteriorating mental state, violent intentions and access to firearms can reach parents and school personnel without producing an effective intervention. The researchers' findings suggest that these opportunities for intervention exist across many school shooting cases, making institutional coordination and early prevention critical.