Platform

Compare

Publishing comparison slice.

Reader surface

Publishing comparison slice.

Factor
AngryPages Baseline
WordPress.com
Medium
Substack
Patreon
Ghost
beehiiv
Kit
Insights
  • Any famous people use them?
  • We publish fast!
  • This is a best bet for you
  • It's a pain to set up a site
  • No enterprise-grade security
  • It's good, but hard to find great content
  • Very little imagery, pretty dull
  • They have limited freedoms.
  • You can write hard content here.
  • We help with customer relations.
  • Bank pressure
  • Great monetization scope
  • We'd avoid. The rules are strict.
  • Lots of fake, scammy content.
  • It's too polished, we prefer real.
  • Nice template, loads fast
  • Never heard of them
  • Sounds expensive
  • Never heard of them
  • Sounds a bit expensive
Pricing
  • We're Free to publish with ads
  • Free plan
  • Paid plans shown at $4
  • $8
  • $25/mo billed yearly
  • Member is $5/mo
  • $50/yr
  • Publishing is free, monetization uses member-pool economics
  • Free to publish
  • 10% platform fee + Stripe fees on paid subscriptions
  • At $10k revenue
  • About $1,000 before Stripe fees
  • Free to start
  • Standard plan is 10% of creator income plus processing fees
  • At $10k revenue
  • About $1,000 before processing fees
  • Ghost(Pro) starts at $18/mo Starter
  • $29/mo Publisher billed yearly
  • 0% extra transaction fee
  • At $10k revenue
  • $0 platform fee before Stripe and hosting
  • Launch $0
  • Scale $43/mo
  • Max $96/mo billed yearly
  • Newsletter plan is free up to 10,000 subscribers
  • Paid plans start at $39/mo
Deal
  • We offer 80% of sales, and 50/50% of ads
Primary job
  • Score: 9/10
  • Archive home with day pages, years, names, proof, and layered access
  • Score: 6/10
  • Hosted website/blog publishing
  • Score: 6/10
  • Open writing distribution inside Medium's network
  • Score: 6/10
  • Issue delivery, posts, and subscriptions
  • Score: 6/10
  • Memberships, patronage, and gated posts
  • Score: 6/10
  • Independent publication stack with posts and memberships
  • Score: 6/10
  • Newsletter growth and issue delivery
  • Score: 6/10
  • Creator-first email publishing with newsletters, automations, and paid subscriptions
Archive depth
  • Score: 9/10
  • Built to hold a living record over years
  • Score: 5/10
  • Partial
  • Possible, but generic by default
  • Score: 3/10
  • Weak to partial
  • Great for articles, not a layered private Story system
  • Score: 5/10
  • Partial
  • Old posts exist, but delivery stays the center
  • Score: 5/10
  • Partial
  • Posts and tiers exist, but archive depth is not the core product
  • Score: 7/10
  • Partial to strong if built carefully, but flatter by default
  • Score: 5/10
  • Partial
  • Newsletter-first, archive second
  • Score: 5/10
  • Partial
  • Strong creator-email system, but not a layered archive home by default
Search and browse
  • Score: 9/10
  • Search, names, year routes, quotes, and proof entry points
  • Score: 5/10
  • Depends on site setup and theme structure
  • Score: 3/10
  • Network discovery and tag browsing, weak owned archive depth
  • Score: 5/10
  • Basic archive browsing
  • Score: 5/10
  • Basic feed and membership browsing
  • Score: 5/10
  • Basic publication search and tag browsing
  • Score: 5/10
  • Basic newsletter archive browsing
  • Score: 5/10
  • Basic creator-site and archive browsing around email-first products

Access and proof

Publishing comparison slice.

Factor
AngryPages Baseline
WordPress.com
Medium
Substack
Patreon
Ghost
beehiiv
Kit
Paid access
  • Score: 9/10
  • Paid and public layers stay inside the same archive product
  • Score: 4/10
  • Possible, but usually needs added tooling or plugins
  • Score: 6/10
  • Membership exists, but the creator does not own the full access model
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong subscriptions, narrower archive logic
  • Score: 3/10
  • Strong memberships, weaker archive structure
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong memberships if configured well
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong newsletter subscriptions, archive logic is thinner
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong paid newsletter/subscriber support, thinner archive logic than AngryPages
Proof and receipts
  • Score: 9/10
  • Press, letters, names, and archive artifacts can live beside the work
  • Score: 6/10
  • Possible if built, not native by default
  • Score: 6/10
  • Possible inside articles, not as a native archive-proof layer
  • Score: 4/10
  • Possible, but usually flatter and post-bound
  • Score: 4/10
  • Possible, but usually attached to posts and updates rather than a full Story system
  • Score: 4/10
  • Possible, but usually custom and less integrated
  • Score: 6/10
  • Possible, but not the native shape of the product
  • Score: 6/10
  • Possible inside posts and creator pages, but not as a native proof-and-receipts archive layer
Recurring names
  • Score: 9/10
  • Names are a native browse surface
  • Score: 6/10
  • Possible with custom work, not native by default
  • Score: 5/10
  • Names live in articles, not in a names system
  • Score: 5/10
  • Names live in posts, not in a names system
  • Score: 5/10
  • Names live in posts, not in a names system
  • Score: 5/10
  • Names live in posts and tags, not as a dedicated archive surface
  • Score: 5/10
  • Names live in posts, not in a names system
  • Score: 5/10
  • Names live in emails and posts, not in a dedicated names system

Writer business

Publishing comparison slice.

Factor
AngryPages Baseline
WordPress.com
Medium
Substack
Patreon
Ghost
beehiiv
Kit
Rights and ownership
  • Score: 9/10
  • Archive home, rights posture, and reader business stay attached
  • Score: 4/10
  • Decent ownership, but generic hosted-blog constraints remain
  • Score: 3/10
  • Weak ownership posture compared with an owned archive
  • Score: 7/10
  • Cleaner than social, but still centered on Substack's product surface
  • Score: 7/10
  • Cleaner than social, but the audience still lives inside Patreon first
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong ownership posture for a publication stack
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong newsletter ownership posture
  • Score: 8/10
  • Strong creator ownership posture for email and subscriptions
Best role beside AngryPages
  • Score: 9/10
  • Archive home first
  • Score: 5/10
  • Generic site lane
  • Score: 5/10
  • Open-distribution lane
  • Score: 5/10
  • Issue delivery lane
  • Score: 5/10
  • Membership lane
  • Score: 5/10
  • Publication lane for narrower editorial products
  • Score: 5/10
  • Growth and newsletter lane
  • Score: 5/10
  • Email and subscriber-management lane
Example if revenue is $10,000
  • Score: 9/10
  • Direct publishing keeps most of the gross inside the same product before payment processing, tax, staffing, and operations
  • Score: 5/10
  • The hosting plan is still $0 to $25/mo
  • take-home depends on whatever payment stack you bolt on
  • Score: 7/10
  • No clean fixed payout example: creator earnings come from Medium's member pool, not a simple posted split
  • Score: 5/10
  • About $1,000 goes to Substack first, before Stripe fees
  • Score: 5/10
  • About $1,000 goes to Patreon first, before processing fees and taxes on fees
  • Score: 4/10
  • Ghost's platform fee is still $0
  • the economics are mostly Stripe plus the monthly plan
  • Score: 5/10
  • Flat plan cost matters more than a revenue share here
  • the listed plan is still $0, $43, or $96 per month depending tier
  • Score: 5/10
  • Flat plan cost matters more than a revenue share here
  • the listed plan is free to 10,000 subscribers, then from $39/mo
Sources / References Public references and access dates for the pricing row. Rates can vary by market, plan, and offer.
  • AngryPages: AngryPages baseline pricing reviewed April 19, 2026.
  • WordPress.com: Official pricing page checked April 19, 2026.
  • Medium: Official membership pricing checked April 19, 2026.
  • Substack: Official fee schedule checked April 19, 2026.
  • Patreon: Official fee schedule checked April 19, 2026.
  • Ghost: Official managed-hosting pricing checked April 19, 2026.
  • beehiiv: Official pricing page checked April 19, 2026.
  • Kit: Official help-center pricing checked April 19, 2026.