Platform

Compare

News comparison slice.

News product

News comparison slice.

Factor	AngryPages Baseline	New York Times	Fox News	BBC News	The Guardian	Google News	Yahoo News	Ground News	Reuters	Vice	Al Jazeera	Daily Mirror
Insights	Best for conclusions / gut feelings We judge, not just report Are loyal to friends	I'm a subscriber. I read every day. Best for investigative journalism Liberal	Great for opinion Meets the people who make news Conservative	Not the same as it used to be Seems more biased now Took off Chris Morris' Gota interview	Relies heavily on tips Pro labor	I get a great feed on my mobile Kind of, not consistent Algo finds popular stuff mostly	Great job here Lacks clarity, or direction	Is it "fair use" really? To critique the news?	Not for me Owned by a rich Canada family	I don't like it now	Anti-Israeli views Favors Middle East	I don't read
Pricing	We're Free to publish with ads	Paid digital subscriptions are sold directly by bundle The official help center lists All Access, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter, and Athletic plans but does not surface one fixed headline price	FOX Nation, the paid Fox News upsell Is listed at $8.99/mo $71.88/yr on Prime Video	BBC.com subscriptions are $8.99/mo $49.99 for the first year $89.99/yr on renewal	Guardian premium app pricing is $9.99/mo in the US, with regional equivalents elsewhere	Free to use Google News publication pages are now automatically generated, and Google no longer uses manual Publisher Center setup for them	Free to read as a news portal Subscriptions and paywalls belong to linked publishers where applicable	Pro $9.99/yr Premium $39.99/yr Vantage $99.99/yr	Reuters says newer direct-reader digital subscriptions run at roughly the local equivalent of about USD $1/week after a limited free article allowance	VICE digital-only is $2/mo $20/yr Print + digital is $70/yr	Al Jazeera says its unified reader account is free to join and unlocks the site, app, documentaries, and OTT access	Daily Mirror digital is listed from £1.61/week after a free first month Print vouchers start at £14.85/week Home delivery at £18.00/week
Deal	We offer 80% of sales, and 50/50% of ads
Primary job	Score: 9/10 Living archive with named people, proof, paid reading, and recurring entry points	Score: 6/10 Institutional reporting, subscriptions, and broad news authority	Score: 6/10 Conservative cable-plus-digital news and opinion machine	Score: 6/10 Public-service broadcaster news and global reporting	Score: 6/10 Progressive-liberal news, opinion, and reader-supported journalism	Score: 6/10 News aggregation and discovery across other publishers	Score: 6/10 News portal and aggregation surface	Score: 6/10 Bias-aware news comparison and cross-outlet aggregation	Score: 6/10 Wire reporting and factual syndication across other publishers	Score: 6/10 Voice-first magazine journalism, documentaries, and youth-facing reporting	Score: 8/10 Global broadcaster news with a strong international and Global South frame	Score: 6/10 Mass-market news publishing and tabloid-style reach
Archive depth	Score: 9/10 A reader can move through years, names, quotes, proof, and day pages in one product	Score: 8/10 Strong article archive, but the institutional feed stays first	Score: 8/10 Strong archive, but clips, cycles, and personality-led shows stay first	Score: 8/10 Strong article archive, but broadcaster priorities stay first	Score: 8/10 Strong article archive, but section and opinion feeds stay first	Score: 3/10 Weak Discovery layer first, not an owned archive home	Score: 3/10 Weak Portal layer first, not an owned archive home	Score: 3/10 Weak to partial Comparison layer first, not an owned archive home	Score: 8/10 Strong dispatch archive, but wire service output stays first	Score: 3/10 Partial Strong voice and features, weaker long-form archive packaging than AngryPages	Score: 8/10 Strong global archive, but broadcaster priorities stay first	Score: 8/10 Strong news archive, but recency and headlines stay first
Search and browse	Score: 9/10 Browse by year, day, names, quotes, and proof instead of only by headline	Score: 8/10 Strong search and section browse	Score: 8/10 Strong topic and video browse, with personality-led navigation	Score: 8/10 Strong search and section browse	Score: 8/10 Strong topic and section browse, with better columnist navigation than most	Score: 3/10 Strong search and aggregation, weak owned archive structure	Score: 3/10 Strong headline browse, weak owned archive structure	Score: 3/10 Strong compare-and-discover browse, weak owned archive browse	Score: 8/10 Strong topic and company search, wire-style browse	Score: 5/10 Basic to strong editorial browse by topic and series	Score: 3/10 Strong global and topic browse, weaker named-archive structure than AngryPages	Score: 3/10 Basic to strong search, weaker deep archive structure
Political bias / editorial posture (opinion)	Score: 9/10 Openly personal, anti-establishment, and willing to take sides	Score: 5/10 Liberal-institutional and establishment-coded	Score: 5/10 Conservative-populist and culture-war heavy	Score: 5/10 Centrist-managerial public-service tone	Score: 5/10 Progressive-liberal with activist-friendly opinion culture	Score: 7/10 Aggregation logic, not one clean ideology, but ranking still shapes the frame	Score: 5/10 Portal logic: outlet mix and headline selection shape the frame	Score: 5/10 Meta-bias product: compares other outlets more than it argues one ideology	Score: 5/10 Center-wire neutrality posture with a low-emotion voice	Score: 5/10 Left-cultural, youth-subculture, anti-establishment voice	Score: 5/10 Global South and anti-intervention lean with Qatar-state context	Score: 5/10 Center-left populist tabloid tone

Access and proof

News comparison slice.

Factor	AngryPages Baseline	New York Times	Fox News	BBC News	The Guardian	Google News	Yahoo News	Ground News	Reuters	Vice	Al Jazeera	Daily Mirror
Paid access	Score: 9/10 Public and paid layers live inside the same archive product	Score: 8/10 Strong subscription model around institutional reporting	Score: 6/10 Core site is free paid upsell lives in FOX Nation, not article-by-article archive tiers	Score: 4/10 Mostly public-service and free, though BBC.com now also has a paid subscription in some markets	Score: 6/10 Reader contribution and app subscription model, not archive layering	Score: 6/10 Aggregator only Paid access belongs to the linked publisher	Score: 6/10 Portal only Paid access belongs to linked publishers where applicable	Score: 6/10 Subscription around comparison and bias framing, not archive layering	Score: 4/10 Mixed free and paid business access, not a personal archive model	Score: 4/10 Mixed ads, sponsorships, and media partnerships rather than archive layering	Score: 4/10 Mostly free reader access the account layer is engagement, not a hard paywall	Score: 4/10 Mostly ad-driven with lighter premium layers
Proof and receipts	Score: 9/10 Press, letters, names, and archive artifacts can sit beside the work itself	Score: 5/10 Institutional reporting brings proof, but not a named archive-receipts product	Score: 5/10 Fast clips, guests, and segments rather than an archive-receipts product	Score: 5/10 Institutional reporting brings proof, but not a named archive-receipts product	Score: 8/10 Strong reporting and columns, but not a named archive-receipts product	Score: 5/10 Proof is external because the product is aggregation, not authorship	Score: 4/10 Proof is mostly external because the product is portal-led	Score: 8/10 Strong source comparison, but proof still lives in the linked outlet, not inside the product home	Score: 8/10 Strong factual proof, but it is wire-copy-first, not archive-receipts-first	Score: 4/10 Strong narrative reporting, but proof is usually embedded in stories rather than surfaced as a receipts layer	Score: 8/10 Strong international reporting, but proof still lives inside stories rather than a receipts layer	Score: 5/10 Proof exists inside reporting, but not as an owned archive layer

Business role

News comparison slice.

Factor	AngryPages Baseline	New York Times	Fox News	BBC News	The Guardian	Google News	Yahoo News	Ground News	Reuters	Vice	Al Jazeera	Daily Mirror
Best role beside AngryPages	Score: 9/10 Archive home first	Score: 5/10 News benchmark and comparison lane	Score: 5/10 Right-of-center benchmark and mass-reach cable lane	Score: 5/10 Public-news benchmark lane	Score: 5/10 Progressive benchmark and opinion lane	Score: 5/10 Discovery lane	Score: 5/10 Portal and headline-distribution lane	Score: 5/10 Aggregation and bias-comparison lane	Score: 5/10 Factual benchmark lane	Score: 5/10 Voice-and-feature benchmark lane	Score: 5/10 Global-south and international benchmark lane	Score: 5/10 Press and publicity lane

Sources / References Public references and access dates for the pricing row. Rates can vary by market, plan, and offer.

AngryPages: AngryPages baseline pricing reviewed April 19, 2026.
New York Times: Official NYT subscription help accessed April 19, 2026.
Fox News: Official Fox News pricing announcement accessed April 19, 2026.
BBC News: Official BBC subscription pricing accessed April 19, 2026.
The Guardian: Official Guardian app subscription pricing accessed April 19, 2026.
Google News: Official Google Publisher Center help accessed April 19, 2026.
Yahoo News: Public Yahoo News surface reviewed April 19, 2026.
Ground News: Official subscription pricing checked April 19, 2026.
Reuters: Official Reuters media-center pricing note accessed April 19, 2026.
Vice: Official VICE membership pricing accessed April 19, 2026.
Al Jazeera: Official account-access page accessed April 19, 2026.
Daily Mirror: Official Reach subscription offers accessed April 19, 2026. ReachSubs overview Mirror digital offer